Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 11:42
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What is the best sunscreen available for summers? My skin is oily.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What's wrong with generation Z?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Stocks Rise as Oil Fades and Fed Bets Sink Yields: Markets Wrap - Bloomberg.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
George Clooney Reveals His Wife Amal’s Reaction When He Came Home With His New Hair - HuffPost
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
ESA signs agreement for potential use of Orbital Reef - SpaceNews
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.